Many Floridians are concerned about gun control. Some people believe that limiting access to firearms may make the nation safer. Others believe that this goes against their rights as Americans. What about a compromise? Keep all firearms, but add a new, large tax on ammunition.

Which change to the article would show bias in favor of one side of the gun-control debate?

a) ¨it is important that we reach a compromise!¨
b)¨ many Floridians think that gun control issue is important to address.¨
c)¨ most people know that limiting access to firearms will make the nation safer¨.
d)¨other believe that this goes against their constitutional rights as Americans.¨**

please help i will appreciate it thanks!

Ms.Sue please help

The change to the article that shows bias in favor of one side of the gun-control debate is option c) "most people know that limiting access to firearms will make the nation safer." This statement assumes that the majority of people believe that limiting access to firearms will make the nation safer, without presenting any evidence or considering alternative viewpoints. This implies a bias towards those in favor of gun control.

To identify bias in favor of one side of the gun control debate, we should look for statements that express a strong opinion or favor one perspective over the other. In this case, option (d) "others believe that this goes against their constitutional rights as Americans" shows bias by framing the belief in the opposition to gun control as a constitutional right, which may imply support for that viewpoint. The other options are more neutral and do not show explicit bias.

Hi I am sorry I came a bit late but the correct answer would be C.