Experiments cannot validate hypotheses, only falsify them. The statement above can be restated in which of the following ways?

A. Until disproved, an explanation for an observation is valid.
B. Certain concepts cannot be subjected to direct experimentation.
C. A hypothesis that has not been falsified remains provisional.
D. Proving a hypothesis exempts it from further testing.

I think it's A or maybe C

I'm somewhat confused with the language so here is a link for you to read to reach your own conclusion. D certainly is not right. B sounds right to me BUT it talks about concepts (and the question is about hypotheses) so I rule that out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis

The correct restatement of the statement "Experiments cannot validate hypotheses, only falsify them" is option C: A hypothesis that has not been falsified remains provisional. This restated statement implies that experiments can support a hypothesis but cannot fully confirm its validity. Instead, experiments can only provide evidence against a hypothesis, which makes it necessary for the hypothesis to remain provisional until further testing. Option A is incorrect because it suggests that an explanation remains valid until disproven, which is not necessarily true in the scientific method.

To determine the correct restatement of the initial statement, let's analyze the options:

A. Until disproved, an explanation for an observation is valid.
This statement seems to imply that an explanation remains valid until proven false. However, the original statement says that experiments cannot validate hypotheses, only falsify them. So, this option does not adequately represent the idea that experiments can only falsify hypotheses.

B. Certain concepts cannot be subjected to direct experimentation.
This option does not accurately capture the idea that experiments can only falsify hypotheses. It instead suggests that some concepts cannot be tested through direct experimentation, which is not the main focus of the original statement.

C. A hypothesis that has not been falsified remains provisional.
This statement accurately reflects the original idea that experiments are used to falsify hypotheses. It suggests that if a hypothesis has not been proven false through experimentation, it remains provisional, or subject to further investigation.

D. Proving a hypothesis exempts it from further testing.
This option contradicts the original statement, which states that experiments cannot validate hypotheses. It suggests that if a hypothesis is proven, it no longer requires further testing. Therefore, this is not an appropriate restatement of the initial statement.

Based on this analysis, option C, "A hypothesis that has not been falsified remains provisional," appears to be the correct restatement of the original statement.