42. Are the meanings of the following sentences: 1 similar, 2 contradictory, neither similar nor contradictory?
Politeness is excellent, but it does not pay the bill. Cash is king.
To me these seemed simular because politeness does not pay the bills, however cash does
I would say simular??
To determine whether the meanings of the given sentences are similar, contradictory, or neither, let's analyze the content of each sentence:
1. "Politeness is excellent, but it does not pay the bill."
This sentence implies that while politeness is praiseworthy, it does not have any practical value when it comes to paying bills. There is no direct contradiction with the statement.
2. "Cash is king."
This sentence implies that cash holds utmost importance or superiority over other forms of payment. It emphasizes the significance of having actual money rather than relying on other means of exchange.
By comparing the meanings of these sentences, we can conclude that they are neither similar nor contradictory. While the first sentence addresses the limited effectiveness of politeness in financial matters, the second sentence emphasizes the supremacy of cash as a form of payment. Thus, they express different perspectives rather than contradicting or directly relating to each other.