The case of Buck v. Bell endorsed:
A. harsher prison sentences for XYY males.
B. the use of the PMS defense by women.
C. the development of a comprehensive biologically based crime prevention program.
D. social policies developed during the eugenics movement.
is it C
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell
No, the case of Buck v. Bell did not endorse the development of a comprehensive biologically based crime prevention program. The correct answer is D. social policies developed during the eugenics movement.
To confirm this, you can follow these steps:
1. Understand the context: Buck v. Bell refers to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that took place in 1927 in Virginia. The case involved a woman named Carrie Buck, who was deemed "feebleminded" and was forcibly sterilized as part of a eugenics program.
2. Research the background of the case: Look into the details of Buck v. Bell, exploring how the case unfolded and the arguments presented by both sides. This will help you understand the specific issues addressed in the case.
3. Analyze the court's decision: Read the Supreme Court's decision in Buck v. Bell. Pay attention to the reasoning behind the ruling and the key points made by the justices. This will provide insights into what the court endorsed or supported.
In your research, you will find that the Supreme Court's decision in Buck v. Bell upheld Virginia's eugenics law and set a precedent for the forced sterilization of individuals deemed "unfit" for procreation. The ruling endorsed the social policies developed during the eugenics movement, which aimed to improve the genetic quality of the population through selective breeding and sterilization.
Therefore, the correct answer to your question is D. social policies developed during the eugenics movement.