A utilitarian might use which statement in an argument that supports the use of embryos in stem cell research? (Points : 1)

The harm caused to the embryos outweighs the good that comes from the research.
There would be greater overall happiness from the cures that emerge out of the research than the harm done to the embryos.
Life is better for women when they have to make decisions about what to do with frozen
embryos.
Overall happiness is not important in evaluating the issue.
None of the above

None of the above

http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/80130/part2/sect9.html

I disagree with None of the above.

The harm caused to the embryos outweighs the good that comes from the research.

No.

There would be greater overall happiness from the cures that emerge out of the research than the harm done to the embryos.

Correct.

none of the above

A utilitarian is someone who believes in maximizing overall happiness and minimizing overall harm. In the context of stem cell research, a utilitarian might argue in favor of using embryos by considering the amount of happiness and harm involved.

Looking at the given statements, the utilitarian would likely choose the following statement as their argument:

"There would be greater overall happiness from the cures that emerge out of the research than the harm done to the embryos."

This statement aligns with the utilitarian principle of maximizing overall happiness. The utilitarian would weigh the potential benefits of the research, such as the development of cures, against the harm caused to the embryos. If the overall happiness derived from the research outweighs the harm caused, the utilitarian would support using embryos in stem cell research.

Therefore, the correct option is "There would be greater overall happiness from the cures that emerge out of the research than the harm done to the embryos."