How is a diary, such as Pepys’s, different from a history such as Bede’s?
A. A diary is usually more personal.
B. A diary is usually more objective.
C. A diary is usually more formal.
D. A diary usually lacks historical accuracy.
My choice is A
I agree.
To determine the differences between a diary like Pepys's and a history like Bede's, we can analyze their characteristics.
A diary is usually more personal, as it reflects the thoughts, feelings, and experiences of the writer. It provides a subjective account of events, centered around the individual's perspective. Pepys's diary, for example, captures his daily life, personal observations, and even his private emotions during the 17th century.
On the other hand, a history like Bede's tends to be more objective and focused on providing a factual account of events. Histories aim to present a broader historical narrative, often based on multiple sources and evidential research. Bede's work, "Ecclesiastical History of the English People," for instance, offers a chronological record of early Anglo-Saxon history, emphasizing the spread of Christianity.
Considering the given options, you correctly chose option A - a diary is usually more personal.