A criticism of the information-processing approach is that it
A. doesn't form a comprehensive theory.
B. lacks scientific research.
C. focuses on creativity and imagination, while ignoring other mental processes.
D. views children as blank slates.
To determine the correct answer, let's break down the options and examine each one.
A. doesn't form a comprehensive theory: This option suggests that the information-processing approach is lacking in producing a comprehensive theory. To evaluate this option, you would need to understand what a comprehensive theory entails and compare it to the framework or models offered by the information-processing approach.
B. lacks scientific research: This option asserts that there is a deficiency in scientific research supporting the information-processing approach. To assess this, you would need to consider the available body of research and determine if it is indeed lacking in quantity or quality.
C. focuses on creativity and imagination while ignoring other mental processes: This option indicates a potential imbalance in the scope of mental processes addressed by the information-processing approach. To address this, you would need to comprehend the basic tenets of the approach and compare them against the variety of mental processes that are considered important in cognition.
D. views children as blank slates: This option proposes that the information-processing approach perceives children as completely empty vessels, devoid of any innate capabilities or predispositions. You would need to understand the core concepts of the information-processing approach and its assumptions about the nature of children to determine if this criticism is accurate.
Now, in order to find the correct answer, it is important to consult reputable sources such as scholarly articles, textbooks, or experts in the field. By researching and considering different perspectives, you can make an informed judgment on the most appropriate criticism of the information-processing approach.