essay: politics and the english language
In paragraph 13 of “Politics and the English Language,” Orwell tells the reader that, when observing the typical politician speak, “one often has a curious feeling that one is not watching a live human being but some kind of dummy.” What does the metaphor of the “dummy” bring to Orwell’s argument?
Dummy means a ventriloquist's dummy.
In paragraph 13 of George Orwell's essay "Politics and the English Language," he uses the metaphor of a "dummy" to highlight the lack of originality and authenticity in the language used by politicians. By describing politicians as dummies, Orwell is suggesting that their speech is mechanical, insincere, and devoid of genuine thought.
The metaphor of a "dummy" in this context brings several implications to Orwell's argument. First, a dummy is an inanimate object that lacks the ability to think or express real emotions. This implies that politicians are merely reciting prepared and rehearsed speeches without genuinely engaging with the ideas they present. They are not thinking critically or expressing personal convictions, but rather they are regurgitating scripted language that lacks depth and meaning.
Secondly, a dummy is a lifeless figure controlled by external forces. In using this metaphor, Orwell suggests that politicians are controlled and manipulated by outside influences, such as political parties or special interest groups. This implies that their language is not authentic or reflective of their true thoughts and values, but rather it is shaped by external pressures.
Furthermore, a dummy is often used as a prop or a façade, designed to deceive or divert attention. In this context, Orwell implies that politicians use language as a tool to manipulate public opinion and disguise the truth. By presenting themselves as "dummies," politicians avoid honest communication and avoid taking responsibility for their actions.
Therefore, the metaphor of the "dummy" in Orwell's essay brings significant meaning to his argument. It signifies the lack of authenticity, critical thinking, and genuineness in the language of politicians, shedding light on the deterioration of political discourse and the need for clarity and honesty in communication.