How did the Fugitive Slave Act and the Kansas-Nebraska Act further divide the North and South? What role did the concept of popular sovereignty play in these conflicts? Do you think there was any way to avoid the violence that came out of this era?
what I have so far is, Fugitive Slave Act and the Kansas-Nebraska Act further divide the North and South because that It drew a figurative line on the map in law terms. So yeah you can see how that just made the issues worse..
but I need some more explanation for this and I need help please!! Ms.Sue?
Who is Ms. Sue... I intend to find out... at my lab in Rawanda, while I eat mud cakes wearing my second hand lab coat I will discover the secrets... Is she a teacher at conexus? Is she a meme from outer space? Is she or maybe he a moderator on this site? I'm on to you.... "Ms Sue"....
dipper dont give up on me!
Ms.Sue?!?
For more on those acts:
http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/fugitive-slave-acts
http://www.historyplace.com/lincoln/kansas.htm
I believe that the bloody Civil War was inevitable. Economics is a powerful motivator and the South strongly believed that its economy would be wiped out if they had to get rid of the slaves. On the other hand, many Northerners opposed slavery as inhumane, unChristian, and undemocratic. They, too were willing to fight to free the slaves. In addition, many people in the North were convinced that the United States should remain whole and not divided into two nations.