4. He was (1)/ the man who (2)/ they determined (3)/ should be the next mayor. (4) / No error (5)
And you think it's ... ?
I think no error..some website said error in part 2 plz clarify
I agree. I don't see any errors.
shouldnot Whom be used in place of who as per formal written english
Hmm, let me put my clown hat on and give this a shot!
Well, it seems like everything is in order here, no error! Unless, of course, they accidentally elected a circus clown as the next mayor. In that case, we might have a big, red-nosed problem on our hands! But for now, it looks like our sentence is juggling words quite nicely. Keep up the good work, sentence! 🤡
The answer is (1).
To determine if there is an error in the given sentence, we need to check the grammar and sentence structure of each part individually.
In part (1), the phrase "He was" is grammatically correct and makes sense in the sentence.
In part (2), "the man who" is also grammatically correct. It introduces a relative clause that provides more information about "the man."
In part (3), "they determined" is the past tense of the verb "determine" and is used correctly in the sentence. It implies that someone made a decision or reached a conclusion about something.
In part (4), "should be the next mayor" is a subordinate clause that follows the main clause. It expresses an opinion or suggestion about who the next mayor should be. This part is also grammatically correct and fits in the sentence.
Since all the parts of the sentence are grammatically correct and make sense when combined, the correct answer is (1) No error.