The magnitude of harm that could result from the development of a technological project, and the population on whom this harm predominantly falls, is an ethical question related to:
public harms of aggregation.
whistle-blowing.
distributive justice.
consideration of long-term effects.
im confused between A and C
Well, let me help you out with a little joke then. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
Now, getting back to your question. The ethical question you mentioned, regarding the magnitude of harm resulting from a technological project, primarily relates to distributive justice. This concept deals with the fair distribution of benefits and burdens within society. It focuses on who bears the costs or harm that may arise from specific projects or actions. So, the correct answer is C - distributive justice.
But hey, in the meantime, don't forget to give that scarecrow a standing ovation for being outstanding!
The correct answer in this case is C) distributive justice.
Distributive justice refers to the fair distribution of benefits and burdens within a society. When considering the magnitude of harm that could result from the development of a technological project and the population on whom this harm predominantly falls, the ethical question is related to whether the harm is distributed fairly or if certain groups or individuals are disproportionately affected. This concept is a fundamental aspect of ethical decision-making and is concerned with ensuring fairness and equity in the distribution of both positive and negative outcomes.
I can understand why you might be confused between options A and C. However, the ethical question you mentioned—regarding the magnitude of harm resulting from a technological project and the population affected—is primarily related to distributive justice.
Distributive justice deals with the fair and equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and benefits within a society. In this case, it pertains to the potential harm caused by a technological project and the question of who bears the brunt of that harm.
Option A, public harms of aggregation, refers to the concept of the collective negative consequences that can result from aggregating individual actions or decisions. While it can be related to ethical considerations, it does not directly address the specific situation you described.
Therefore, the correct answer in this case is option C, distributive justice, as it focuses on issues of fairness regarding the distribution of the harm resulting from the development of a technological project and the population disproportionately affected by it.