I really don't get this question
''without the english Civil war, democracy would never have developed.''make a case for or against this statement. give evidence to support your case.
I really don't know how to do this
You need to find how the English Civil War furthered the cause of democracy.
Several parts of this article will help you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Civil_War
I precisely neeedd to appreciate you once again. I am not sure the things I might have implemented in the absence of the information provided by you regarding my area. It has been an absolute hard dilemma for me personally, however , looking at a specialised mode you dealt with it forced me to leap for gladness. I'm happier for this advice and then wish you really know what a powerful job you were accomplishing educating the others using a web site. I am certain you have never come across any of us.
No problem, I can certainly help you with this question. To approach it, you need to analyze the factors that contribute to the development of democracy and then evaluate the significance of the English Civil War in that process. Here's how you can make a case for or against the given statement:
Case For:
1. Historical Context: The English Civil War (1642-1651) marks a significant turning point in English history. It resulted in the overthrow of King Charles I and the establishment of the Commonwealth of England under the rule of Oliver Cromwell. This event created space for political experimentation and the emergence of democratic ideas.
2. Ideas of Liberty: The Civil War challenged the authority of the monarchy and feudal institutions. It fostered debates and discussions about individuals' rights, religious freedom, and representation. The Levellers, a political movement during that time, advocated for equal rights and a social contract between the government and the people, providing a foundation for democratic principles.
3. Execution of King Charles I: The trial and execution of King Charles I in 1649 demonstrated the possibility of holding a monarch accountable for their actions. This event highlighted the power of the people and laid the foundation for the principle of constitutional limits on the power of rulers.
Case Against:
1. Pre-existing Democratic Traditions: England had already developed parliamentary institutions and representative councils before the Civil War. The Magna Carta, signed in 1215, limited the power of the monarchy and established rights for the English nobility. Thus, democracy had already been evolving in England, and the Civil War merely accelerated this process.
2. Influence of Enlightenment: The English Civil War occurred during a broader global intellectual movement known as the Enlightenment, which emphasized reason, science, and individual rights. The ideas of influential thinkers like John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, who argued for limited government power and individual liberties, were not directly tied to the Civil War but contributed to the development of democracy independently.
3. Other Historical Factors: Democracy had been developing in other parts of the world without the occurrence of civil wars. For example, the Swiss Confederation and the Dutch Republic established democratic governance without experiencing a civil war. This demonstrates that there can be alternative paths to democracy that do not rely on armed conflict.
Ultimately, you should consider all the points and evidence you have gathered and weigh the pros and cons to decide whether you support the statement that "without the English Civil War, democracy would never have developed." Remember to support your case with specific evidence and examples to make it stronger.