two results of having a brief
Constitution that is a basic
framework, rather than a
specific plan, of governmen
The answer is By congress- create Taxes and By Supreme Court- Define impeachment powers.
doesn't cover every eventuality and leaves a lot of room for interpretation.
m bn
Having a brief Constitution that is a basic framework, rather than a specific plan, of government can result in the following:
1. Flexibility: A brief Constitution allows for flexibility in adapting to changing times and circumstances. As it provides only a general outline of governance principles, it can be easier to amend or interpret compared to a highly detailed and specific constitution. This flexibility enables the government to respond to new challenges, social changes, and emerging issues without being restricted by rigid provisions.
2. Vagueness and Interpretation: A brief Constitution may result in a higher degree of vagueness and ambiguity in its provisions. As it lacks specific details and guidelines, it relies on interpretation by lawmakers, judges, and legal experts. This can lead to different interpretations and debates, raising questions about the intended meaning and scope of constitutional principles, rights, and powers. The interpretation process can significantly impact public policies and decisions.
To find more specific examples or details regarding the impact of having a brief Constitution, one can refer to constitutional legal scholars, case law, and constitutional commentaries. These sources often provide in-depth analysis and discussion on the effects of different constitutional frameworks and how they shape the functioning of governments. Additionally, legal journals, articles, and scholarly literature on comparative constitutional law can offer comparative analysis of countries with brief constitutions and their governance outcomes.