If relative care is not an option for a family, a live-in solution may be care by a
A. teenager. B. peer. C. Nanny D. Neighbor
C.
Correct.
Thank you
The correct answer is C. Nanny.
To arrive at this answer, let's break down the options and determine the most suitable choice.
A. Teenager: While a teenager can provide some level of care, they may not have the experience or expertise that is often required for full-time care. Additionally, they might have other commitments such as school or extracurricular activities which might limit their availability.
B. Peer: A peer refers to someone who is at a similar age or level of experience. It is unlikely that a peer will have the necessary qualifications or background in caregiving to meet the needs of the family.
C. Nanny: A nanny is a professional caregiver who typically resides in the family's home. They are responsible for providing full-time care to the children or other family members in need. Nannies usually have experience, training, and qualifications in child care or elder care, depending on the specific requirements of the family.
D. Neighbor: While it can be helpful to have neighbors who can offer occasional assistance or support, relying solely on a neighbor for full-time care might not be practical. Neighbors may have their own commitments and responsibilities that may prevent them from providing the necessary continuous care.
Therefore, among the given options, the most appropriate choice for a live-in solution when relative care is not an option would be a nanny (option C).