Describe some positive and negative events of the trustee period, and provide your own evaluation of the rule of the trustees as either generally a success or a failure.
people, I had the same problem but now I figured it and I got a 10/10 so... yeah. Il help you with the pros and cons but the "provide your own evaluation of the rule of the trustees as either generally a success or a failure" is your own thoughts so....
I put... There were many pros and cons about the Trustee period. Some of the cons were they didn't focus much on education or religion because they were trying to build homes and provide the necessary items needed to sustain life.They didn't really really have a strong government as well.The pros were in 1736, improved laws prohibited the marketing and the use of rum.Another benefit is they made slavery forbidden.
someone please help ASAP
http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/trustee-georgia-1732-1752
Ms.sue the answer is not there
Tysm!
Ooof spelled mah name wrong...
The trustee period refers to the era in American history from 1732 to 1752, during which the British Crown designated a group of trustees to govern the newly established colony of Georgia. This period saw both positive and negative events that shaped the development of the colony. Let's examine some of these events and then evaluate the overall success or failure of the trustees' rule.
Positive events of the trustee period:
1. Establishment of Savannah: One of the notable successes during this period was the establishment of the city of Savannah. The trustees meticulously planned the layout of the town, implementing a grid pattern that allowed for organized development.
2. Slavery ban: The trustees initially imposed a ban on slavery in Georgia, aiming to create a society without the institutionalized institution. This decision was seen as a positive step towards the abolition of slavery.
Negative events of the trustee period:
1. Limitations on self-government: The trustees maintained tight control over the colony, which limited the settlers' ability to govern themselves. As a result, colonists had limited say in decision-making processes.
2. Economic hardships: The strict regulations imposed by the trustees hindered economic growth and development in Georgia. The ban on slavery, in particular, hindered the plantation economy that was prevalent in other Southern colonies.
Evaluation of the rule of the trustees:
The evaluation of the rule of the trustees during the trustee period is subjective and can be seen from different perspectives. However, generally, their rule can be considered a failure for the following reasons:
1. Limited self-government: The trustees' control over the settlers hindered the growth of a functioning self-governing society. This limited the colonists' ability to develop institutions and systems that could sustain and govern the colony effectively.
2. Economic setbacks: The trustees' stringent regulations, including the ban on slavery, created economic challenges for Georgia. The colony struggled to compete with its neighboring Southern colonies, which heavily relied on slave labor for their agrarian economies.
3. Early departure: Ultimately, the trustees' inability to attract enough settlers and effectively manage the colony led to their voluntary abandonment of their roles after only two decades.
In conclusion, while the trustee period did have some positive aspects, the overall evaluation suggests that the rule of the trustees in Georgia during that era can be considered a failure. The limitations on self-government and economic setbacks hampered the colony's development, ultimately leading to the trustees' voluntary departure.