Why might the Framers have wanted the presidents power in foreign affairs to be so broad?

Be sure to read through Related Questions below. This question has been brought up many times.

The Framers of the United States Constitution wanted the President to have broad powers in foreign affairs for several reasons:

1. Efficiency in decision-making: By centralizing the authority in the hands of the President, the Framers believed that foreign policy decisions could be made quickly and efficiently, without getting bogged down by the slower processes of congressional deliberation.

2. Unity in international negotiations: The Framers recognized that a unified and consistent voice in international relations would enhance the country's standing and bargaining power on the global stage. By vesting broad foreign affairs powers in the President, they hoped to present a unified front in negotiations and ensure that the country's interests were effectively represented.

3. Protection of national security: The Framers understood that the President, as the single individual at the head of the executive branch, would be most capable of responding swiftly and decisively to emerging threats or crises. Granting broad powers in foreign affairs allowed the President to act in the best interest of national security without being hindered by lengthy legislative processes.

It's important to note that while the Framers intended for the President to have considerable authority in foreign affairs, they also implemented a system of checks and balances to prevent any abuse of power. Congress, for example, was given the power to declare war, ratify treaties, and oversee the executive branch through its confirmation powers. This system acts as a safeguard to ensure that the President's broad powers are exercised responsibly and with the support of other branches of government.