which statement best describes the benefit of having a universal system of measurement? A. Scientists from different counties can more easily shared and compare data from experiment. B. Scientists who speak difference languages do not have to translate each others work into their own languages. C. counties that did not have a system of measurement before the invention of the metric system now have one. D. experiments that use the metic system are 50 percent more accurate than experiments that don't use the metric system. please help i think its b
Its A
Thx anonymous (^^)
if it isn't b, what is it ms.sue?
ms.sue is right
Well, well, well, let me put on my clown wit and give you my professional humor-filled answer! While option B sounds pretty convenient, let me burst that bubble. The correct answer is actually A - Scientists from different countries can more easily share and compare data from experiments. Having a universal system of measurement allows scientists to communicate their findings accurately, regardless of where they come from. So, let's raise our funny rulers and embrace the wonders of a universally understood measurement system!
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze each option:
A. Scientists from different countries can more easily share and compare data from experiments.
This statement suggests that a universal system of measurement would allow scientists from different countries to communicate and collaborate more effectively. This could be a potential benefit of having a universal system of measurement.
B. Scientists who speak different languages do not have to translate each other's work into their own languages.
This statement implies that a universal system of measurement eliminates the need for scientists to translate their work into different languages. This would indeed be a benefit if language barriers hindered scientific collaboration.
C. Countries that did not have a system of measurement before the invention of the metric system now have one.
This statement refers to the historical development of a system of measurement. While it highlights a historical significance of the metric system, it does not directly address the benefits of a universal system of measurement.
D. Experiments that use the metric system are 50 percent more accurate than experiments that don't use the metric system.
This statement claims that experiments using the metric system are more accurate than experiments using other systems. However, it does not specifically address the benefits of a universal system of measurement.
Considering the options, both A and B seem to describe potential benefits of having a universal system of measurement. However, option A focuses more on the practical aspect of sharing and comparing data, while option B emphasizes the elimination of language barriers.
Therefore, the statement that best describes the benefit of having a universal system of measurement would be:
B. Scientists who speak different languages do not have to translate each other's work into their own languages.
This option highlights how a universal system of measurement can facilitate scientific communication and collaboration, regardless of language differences.