Restitution does NOT help:
A. an offender to accept personal responsibility.
B. offset the victim's physical and emotional losses.
C. the victim to feel more respected by the system.
D. a victim to take revenge on his or her offender.
I think it's D., but not sure.
I agree.
To determine the correct answer, let's break down the options and their meanings:
A. an offender to accept personal responsibility: Restitution is intended to hold the offender accountable for their actions and make amends for the harm caused. It can contribute to the offender accepting personal responsibility for their wrongdoing.
B. offset the victim's physical and emotional losses: Restitution aims to provide financial compensation to the victim for any physical or emotional harm they have suffered as a result of the offense. It helps to alleviate the victim's losses.
C. the victim to feel more respected by the system: The implementation of restitution in the criminal justice system can make the victim feel more respected and acknowledged. It recognizes the harm they have endured and provides support.
D. a victim to take revenge on his or her offender: Restitution is not intended for the victim to seek revenge on the offender. It focuses on addressing the harm caused and providing compensation, rather than promoting revenge.
Based on this information, it appears that option D is incorrect since restitution does not serve as a means for the victim to take revenge on the offender. As such, the correct answer is not D.