The first people to allow their citizens to prosecute an offender in the name of an injured party were the:
A. Babylonians
B. Sumerians
C. Romans
D. Greeks
By book mentions that both Babylonians and Sumerians followed "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" doctrine.
I am confused on this one.
I think it was in Hammurabi's Code of Laws, thus it was the Babylonians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammurabi
My answer was Babylonians on the quiz. I got it wrong. I will not know the right answer is. They will probably post that tomorrow.
I'm sorry -- but this answer also mystifies me. Please check your book to see if you missed something.
sumerians
I answered Sumerians and it said it was wrong and the answer is Greeks
To determine the correct answer, let's break down the question and look at the options provided.
The question asks about the first people to allow their citizens to prosecute an offender in the name of an injured party. It implies that this practice involved the concept of seeking justice on behalf of the victim.
Let's examine each option:
A. Babylonians: The Babylonians are known for having a legal code known as the Hammurabi Code. This code included the principle of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," suggesting a system of punishment in proportion to the harm inflicted. However, it does not necessarily indicate citizen participation in prosecution.
B. Sumerians: The Sumerians were an ancient civilization that predates the Babylonians. While they had a well-organized legal system, there is limited information available about their exact practices regarding citizen participation in prosecuting offenders.
C. Romans: The Romans had an extensive legal system, but they relied heavily on government officials, such as magistrates and judges, to bring prosecutions and administer justice. While Roman citizens could play a role as accusers in some cases, it did not grant them broader rights to prosecute in the name of an injured party.
D. Greeks: The Greeks had a decentralized system of city-states, each with its own legal practices. However, they did not generally allow citizens to prosecute offenders independently in the name of an injured party.
Based on the given options, it appears that the best choice would be either A. Babylonians or B. Sumerians. Both cultures had legal systems that included the "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" principle, which could suggest a connection to allowing citizens to seek justice for themselves. However, without further information, it is challenging to determine which of these two options is the correct one.
Therefore, in this case, the best course of action might be to consult additional sources, scholarly articles, or experts in ancient history to get a more definite answer.