The economy of ancient Rome did not depend heavily on
A. industry.
B. slaves.
C. trade.
D. agriculture
i think A
I agree.
A. makes more sense ppl smh
To determine the correct answer, we can examine each option and assess its relevance to the economy of ancient Rome.
A. Industry: Ancient Rome did have some form of manufacturing and production, such as pottery, glassmaking, and textile production. However, industry played a much smaller role in the Roman economy compared to other aspects.
B. Slaves: Slavery was a fundamental element of the Roman economy. Enslaved individuals were employed in various sectors, including agriculture, mining, construction, and household tasks. Slavery was widespread and highly influential in shaping the economic system of ancient Rome.
C. Trade: Ancient Rome's economy was heavily dependent on trade. The Roman Empire established an extensive network of roads, canals, and ports, facilitating the transportation of goods across vast distances. Trade routes and the movement of goods were essential for economic growth, as Rome imported various resources and luxury products from other regions.
D. Agriculture: Agriculture was arguably the most crucial sector in the Roman economy. Ancient Rome relied heavily on farming and large-scale agricultural estates called latifundia. The Romans cultivated crops like grains, olives, grapes, and raised livestock. Agricultural production sustained the population, generated revenue, and was a basis for trade.
Considering the options above, the correct answer would be A. Industry. While the Romans did have some level of manufacturing, it was not as central to their economy as agriculture, trade, and slavery.