@Princess Anna, @Writeacher, @Miss. Sue
Please Help Me Please Help! I really don't Get It Please! ? ? ? ? It's due today! HELP! ANYONE !.....
What were the positions of the Federalists and Anti- Federalists on the new Constitution? Provide at least two details supporting why each side supported or did not support the new Constitution.
http://staff.gps.edu/mines/APUSH%20-antifederalists_vs_federalists.htm
yes you are correct
I can help you with that! To understand the positions of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists on the new Constitution, we should start by understanding who they were and their main beliefs.
1. Federalists: The Federalists were in favor of the new Constitution, which aimed to replace the Articles of Confederation. They believed in a strong central government that could effectively govern and unify the states. Here are two details supporting why they supported the Constitution:
- Centralized Power: Federalists believed that a strong central government was necessary to maintain law and order, promote economic growth, and defend the nation against external threats. They thought that a single executive branch and a bicameral legislature would ensure effectiveness and stability in governing.
- Improved National Economy: The Federalists argued that the new Constitution would provide a favorable climate for economic growth. They believed that a strong central government could regulate commerce, establish a uniform currency, and negotiate treaties with foreign nations, thus creating a more prosperous nation.
2. Anti-Federalists: The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the new Constitution because they feared it would lead to an overbearing central government that could potentially infringe upon the rights of individuals and the states. Here are two details supporting why they did not support the Constitution:
- Lack of Bill of Rights: One of the main concerns of the Anti-Federalists was the absence of a Bill of Rights in the original Constitution. They believed that without explicit protections for individual liberties, the central government could abuse its power and oppress the people.
- States' Rights: Anti-Federalists were strong advocates for states' rights. They were concerned that a strong central government would diminish the power and autonomy of the individual states. They believed that the states should retain significant authority to govern their respective regions and that a centralized government would lead to tyranny.
To find more information to support these points, you can refer to historical documents such as the Federalist Papers (written by Federalists) and the Anti-Federalist Papers (written by Anti-Federalists). These documents provide insights into the arguments and ideologies of both groups regarding the new Constitution.