If there is some debate about whether a particular bit of information should or should not be included in an article, what is the process for deciding?
The editor and publisher make that decision.
But what is the process if they have an argument/disagree whether or not the information should be included or not?
The publisher usually has the last word.
The process for deciding whether or not a particular bit of information should be included in an article can vary depending on the specific context and the publication's guidelines. However, here are some general steps that are often followed in such situations:
1. Assess the relevance: The first step is to evaluate the relevance of the information to the article's topic. Is it directly related to the main subject matter or does it provide valuable context or background? If the information is not directly relevant, it may not be necessary to include it.
2. Evaluate the credibility: It is important to assess the credibility and accuracy of the information. Is it supported by reliable sources or backed by evidence? If the information comes from unverified or questionable sources, it may be best to omit it to maintain the integrity of the article.
3. Consider the perspective: Think about the different perspectives or viewpoints on the topic. Is the information biased or one-sided? Including multiple perspectives can help provide a well-rounded view of the subject rather than presenting only one side of the story.
4. Review the impact: Consider the potential impact of including or omitting the information. Will its inclusion significantly enhance the article or provide a deeper understanding of the topic? Conversely, will its omission lead to a lack of crucial information? Balancing the impact of including or excluding the information is crucial in making an informed decision.
5. Seek input from others: If there is a debate or disagreement about the inclusion of the information, it can be helpful to seek input from other reliable sources or colleagues. Discussing the different viewpoints and gathering diverse perspectives can aid in making a more informed decision.
Ultimately, the decision-making process for including or excluding information in an article involves careful consideration of relevance, credibility, perspective, impact, and sometimes seeking input from others. It aims to maintain accuracy, fairness, and adherence to the publication's guidelines.