Pseudoscience and nonscience differ in that:
Are these your choices?
A. nonscience is not valuable and pseudoscience is valuable.
B. pseudoscience deceives, misleads, or misinforms and this is not a primary characteristic of nonscience.
C. nonscience forms hypotheses and pseudoscience does not.
D. pseudoscience has led to major changes in intellectual thought and nonscience has not.
What is your answer?
Pseudoscience and nonscience are both terms used to describe areas of knowledge or claims that are not considered to be scientific. However, they differ in their methodology and adherence to scientific principles.
Pseudoscience refers to practices or beliefs that are presented as scientific but lack empirical evidence, do not follow the scientific method, and often rely on unfounded assumptions or flawed logic. Pseudoscientific claims may be dressed up with scientific terminology or presented in a way that gives them an appearance of legitimacy, but they lack the rigorous and systematic approach that characterizes genuine scientific inquiry.
On the other hand, nonscience refers to areas of knowledge or claims that are not subject to scientific investigation or cannot be evaluated using scientific methods. This can include subjective matters, such as personal opinions or preferences, aesthetic judgments, and ethical or moral beliefs. While nonscience may not have a basis in empirical evidence or adhere to scientific principles, it is not necessarily presented as scientific and can coexist alongside scientific knowledge without making scientific claims.
In summary, pseudoscience tries to mimic scientific inquiry but lacks the proper scientific methodology and evidence, while nonscience refers to areas of knowledge outside the realm of scientific investigation.