Question: 2 of 5: Which topic would a writer be least likely to ask a peer reviewer to comment on?Select one of the options below as your answer:A. use of subordinate clauses within the essay B. personal experiences used to support a pointC. how the body of the essay is organized
"a peer reviewer" -- wouldn't that be a classmate? Which one of those three would you NOT ask a classmate to help you with?
B lol thanks
How can you get better help from peer reviews?A. write better essays B. work as a team C. ask questions
ask questions
To determine which topic a writer would be least likely to ask a peer reviewer to comment on, we need to consider which topic is less likely to be evaluated by someone else. Let's analyze the options:
A. Use of subordinate clauses within the essay: This refers to the sentence structure and grammar within the essay. It is quite common for a writer to ask a peer reviewer to comment on the use of subordinate clauses, as this can significantly impact the readability and clarity of the writing.
B. Personal experiences used to support a point: This refers to the writer incorporating their own personal experiences into the essay to provide evidence or examples. The use of personal experiences can be subjective and may not be suitable for all types of essays. Therefore, it is important for a writer to receive feedback from a peer reviewer on whether their personal experiences effectively contribute to the argument or point being made.
C. How the body of the essay is organized: This refers to the overall structure and organization of the essay's paragraphs and sections. The organization of the essay is a critical aspect of effective writing, and a writer usually seeks feedback from a peer reviewer on how well the body of the essay flows and whether the main points are logically presented.
Considering the options, the topic that a writer would be least likely to ask a peer reviewer to comment on is option A, the use of subordinate clauses within the essay. This is because it is relatively easier to identify and correct issues related to sentence structure and grammar using automated tools or personal proofreading. However, feedback on personal experiences (option B) and the essay's organization (option C) often requires a subjective evaluation, which can be provided more effectively by a peer reviewer.