Is this a source that you would consider a scholsrly source.
Kliff, S. 2012. Seven facts about America’s mental health-care system. The Washington Post.
No. A daily newspaper is not considered a scholarly source.
To determine if an article is a scholarly source, there are several criteria you can consider:
1. Author: Check if the author is an expert or professional in the field. In this case, the author is Sarah Kliff, a journalist for The Washington Post. While she may have expertise in reporting on current events, she may not necessarily have a scholarly background.
2. Publication: Consider the source where the article was published. The Washington Post is a reputable and widely-read newspaper, but it is primarily a news outlet rather than an academic journal. Scholarly sources are typically peer-reviewed journals that publish research by experts in a specific field.
3. Purpose and Audience: Scholarly sources are written for a specialized audience of researchers, academics, and professionals. The purpose is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge and support claims with evidence. In contrast, newspapers like The Washington Post target a general readership and focus on providing news analysis, opinions, and current events.
Based on these criteria, the article you provided from The Washington Post does not meet the criteria of a scholarly source. It is important to note that while this article may not be scholarly, it can still provide valuable insights and context on a particular topic. It is essential to consider the source, author, and purpose when evaluating the reliability and credibility of any information.