what does it mean when Steven said The case has nothing to do with 'disagreeable ideas' in the Texas v Johnson case?
flag-burning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson
thank you for being so specific
You're welcome.
In the Texas v Johnson case, when Justice Stevens said that the case had nothing to do with 'disagreeable ideas,' he was emphasizing the specific issue at hand and clarifying the nature of the case. To understand the meaning of Stevens' statement in more detail, we can look at the context of the case.
Texas v Johnson was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1989 that dealt with the constitutional right to freedom of speech. The case centered around a man named Gregory Lee Johnson, who burned an American flag during a political protest at the Republican National Convention in 1984. Johnson was arrested and charged under a Texas law that prohibited desecration of the flag.
During the Supreme Court deliberations, one of the key arguments raised was whether flag burning constituted a form of protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment. When Justice Stevens made the statement you mentioned, he was highlighting that the case was not about whether the act of flag burning was personally disagreeable or offensive. Instead, the focus was on the broader question of whether such an act was protected by the constitutional right to freedom of speech.
To fully comprehend Justice Stevens' remark, it is essential to examine his reasoning and the arguments made throughout the case. By analyzing the transcripts and opinions of the Supreme Court justices involved, as well as consulting legal analyses or scholarly articles on the topic, you can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the case and the context of Steven's statement.