The practice known as "judge-shopping" is a result of:
A. plea bargaining.
B. sentencing disparities.
C. statutory sentencing guidelines.
D. mandatory sentence structures.
is it B
I agree.
To determine the correct answer, let's examine the options provided and understand what "judge-shopping" refers to.
"Judge-shopping" is the practice of attempting to have a particular judge assigned to a case who is believed to be more favorable or lenient than other judges. It involves seeking out a specific judge based on their reputation or past rulings.
Now let's assess the options and see which one is most closely related to the practice of judge-shopping:
A. Plea bargaining: Plea bargaining refers to the negotiation process in criminal cases, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a reduced sentence or charges. While judge-shopping can potentially influence the plea bargaining process, it is not directly a result of it. Therefore, A is not the correct answer.
B. Sentencing disparities: Sentencing disparities refer to differences in the severity of sentences imposed for similar crimes. Judge-shopping can be a form of seeking reduced sentencing disparities if certain judges are known to be more lenient. Therefore, B is a plausible option.
C. Statutory sentencing guidelines: Statutory sentencing guidelines are predetermined rules or guidelines established by legislation to guide judges in sentencing. Judge-shopping does not directly relate to the existence of statutory guidelines, as it is more about seeking out specific judges based on their tendencies. Therefore, C is not the correct answer.
D. Mandatory sentence structures: Mandatory sentence structures are laws that require judges to impose a specific minimum sentence for certain crimes. Judge-shopping is typically done to avoid harsh or mandatory sentences, so it is not a result of mandatory sentence structures. Therefore, D is not the correct answer.
Based on our analysis, the most appropriate answer is B. Sentencing disparities. However, please note that judge-shopping can also be influenced by other factors, such as familiarity or personal preferences of the litigants involved.