3. Utilitarians evaluate the morality of an act by examining the consequences of the act.

the person carrying out the act.

the feelings of the person carrying out the act.

the amount of pain generated by the act.



4. Logic will examine which of the following arguments? (Points : 1)
Reductive
Seductive
Abductive
Inductive




5. Ethics is the study of (Points : 1)
propositional knowledge.
right and wrong.
beauty.
culture.




6. A philosophical argument should involve (Points : 1)
yelling.
hurt feelings.
evidence or reasons.
anger.



7. One studies ethics because (Points : 1)
it provides insight into moral problems.
it solves all moral problems.
it causes migraine headaches.
it makes one more popular.



8. Virtue ethics regards which of these as virtues? (Points : 1)
power
envy
temperance
inconsistency



9. The three classical ethical theories are (Points : 1)
ontology, utilitarianism, and radicalism.
emotivism, oncology, and virtue ethics.
deontology, virtue ethics, and materialism.
utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.



10. One objection to utilitarianism is that it
(Points : 1)
is too difficult to make popular.
was developed by the English.
may ignore minority rights.
fails to consider an act’s consequences

3. The statement suggests that utilitarians evaluate the morality of an act by examining the consequences of the act, rather than considering the person carrying out the act, their feelings, or the amount of pain generated by the act. To understand more about utilitarianism and how they evaluate the morality of an act, you can read about the principles and ideas of utilitarianism and how they prioritize the overall well-being or happiness of the majority.

4. The question asks which arguments are examined by logic. Logic is a branch of philosophy that deals with the principles of correct reasoning, and it examines different types of arguments. The correct answers are reductive, seductive, abductive, and inductive. These are different methods or approaches to reasoning and argumentation, and logic seeks to evaluate the strength and validity of these arguments.

5. The question asks about the subject of study in ethics. Ethics is the study of right and wrong, not propositional knowledge, beauty, or culture. It deals with moral principles, values, and decisions, and it seeks to understand what is morally right or wrong in various situations.

6. A philosophical argument should involve evidence or reasons, not yelling, hurt feelings, or anger. In philosophy, arguments are constructed and evaluated based on logical reasoning, evidence, and sound premises. Philosophical arguments are meant to be logical and rational, and they require supporting evidence or reasons to make a case or prove a point.

7. One studies ethics because it provides insight into moral problems, not because it solves all moral problems, causes migraine headaches, or makes one more popular. Studying ethics allows individuals to understand and analyze complex moral dilemmas, ethical theories, and ethical decision-making frameworks. It helps in developing critical thinking skills, ethical reasoning, and moral judgment.

8. Virtue ethics regards temperance as a virtue, not power, envy, or inconsistency. Virtue ethics is a philosophical approach that focuses on developing moral character and virtues. It emphasizes the importance of cultivating virtues such as temperance, courage, justice, wisdom, and honesty to guide ethical actions and decisions.

9. The three classical ethical theories are utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, not ontology, emotivism, oncology, or materialism. These three theories provide different perspectives on how to make ethical decisions and evaluate moral actions. Utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences or outcomes of actions, deontology focuses on duty and adherence to moral rules, and virtue ethics emphasizes the development of moral character and virtues.

10. One objection to utilitarianism is that it may ignore minority rights, not that it is too difficult to make popular, was developed by the English, or fails to consider an act's consequences. Critics argue that utilitarianism's emphasis on maximizing overall happiness or well-being can lead to the neglect or violation of the rights and interests of minority groups. Alternatively, some critics may argue that the focus on consequences alone fails to fully consider ethical considerations such as individual rights or justice. To fully understand these objections and other criticisms of utilitarianism, you can explore writings and discussions on this topic.