1. The "society-at-large" explanation of police corruption holds that:
A. a few "rotten apples" can spoil a whole police force.
B. corruption evolves from contradictory sets of norms in police organizations.
C. corruption is the result of the moral failure of the police leadership.
D. police are corrupted by citizens offering money and gifts to officers.
is it D
I agree.
To determine the correct answer to the question, it is necessary to carefully analyze each option and understand the concept of police corruption.
The "society-at-large" explanation of police corruption suggests that corruption in the police force is primarily influenced by external factors in society, such as the behavior and actions of citizens. Let's evaluate each option:
A. The option suggests that a few "rotten apples" can spoil the whole police force. While this might be a contributing factor in some cases, it does not align with the "society-at-large" explanation, which focuses on external influences rather than internal factors within the police force.
B. The option states that corruption evolves from contradictory sets of norms in police organizations. Although organizational norms can play a role in shaping behavior, this explanation does not address the societal factors that the "society-at-large" explanation focuses on.
C. The option proposes that corruption is the result of the moral failure of police leadership. While leadership can influence and contribute to corruption, this explanation specifically implicates the leaders and does not consider the broader impact of society.
D. The option suggests that police are corrupted by citizens offering money and gifts to officers. This aligns with the "society-at-large" explanation as it focuses on external factors and how citizens' actions can influence corruption within the police force.
Therefore, based on the analysis, the correct answer is D, "police are corrupted by citizens offering money and gifts to officers."