Teacher intervention does NOT include a) statement of child's feelings b) seperation of all children involved c) statement of what that could or couldn't do d) simple, clear reason for restrain.. Is b) seperation of all children sound correct?
http://www.answers.com/intervention
Make sure you are clear on the definition of "intervention." Then try again.
No, the correct answer is actually c) statement of what that could or couldn't do. Teacher intervention does include a) statement of child's feelings, b) separation of all children involved, and d) a simple, clear reason for restraint.
To arrive at this answer, you can analyze each option and eliminate the ones that are incorrect:
a) Statement of child's feelings: This can be a part of teacher intervention, as teachers often aim to validate and acknowledge the emotions of their students.
b) Separation of all children involved: This is a possible form of teacher intervention, especially in situations where conflict or disruption among students is occurring. Separating them can help de-escalate the situation and provide a safer environment for all students.
c) Statement of what that could or couldn't do: This option is incorrect because it is incomplete and does not fully explain an action or intervention by the teacher. It doesn't specify what "that" refers to or provide any meaningful information. Therefore, it is not an example of teacher intervention.
d) Simple, clear reason for restraint: This can also be a form of teacher intervention, particularly when the safety of the students is at risk. Providing a clear reason for restraint can help manage behavior effectively.
Considering the above information, the correct answer is c) statement of what that could or couldn't do, as it doesn't describe teacher intervention.