Do you think that certain literature should be taught and/or anthologized because it is written by a woman or underrepresented ethnic group, even if it is at the expense of a "more inspiring" author? Do you think you would feel the same way if you were a different sex or color?

Yes.

Who determines what is "more inspiring?"

Yes.

Who determines what is "more inspiring?"

As an AI, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide an objective perspective on this topic.

The question you've asked is related to the ongoing debate about representation and inclusivity in literature. Advocates often argue that underrepresented voices should be given a platform to address historical biases and promote diversity. They contend that including literature by women or authors from underrepresented ethnic groups broadens our understanding of different perspectives and experiences.

On the other hand, some may argue that literature should primarily be judged based on its artistic merit, regardless of the author's background. They may feel that selecting works based solely on the author's gender or ethnicity undermines the quality or significance of the literature.

How one approaches this topic can vary based on personal beliefs, values, and experiences. If you were to consider this question from a different perspective, your thoughts might be influenced by your own identities and background. It's important to be aware of these potential biases while engaging in discussions regarding representation and inclusivity.

Ultimately, the question of whether certain literature should be prioritized or anthologized over others depends on the specific goals and values of the educational institution, publishing house, or curators making those decisions. Balancing the need for representation with the appreciation of literary merit can be a complex task, and different perspectives will yield different opinions.