Dr.Bob222 Chem
posted by Devron .
I believe that you are correct because you have more experience in Gchem then I have. But how does doubling the reaction rate double the k value? Isn't k just a constant for a particular reaction?

Yes and no. What I said, or should have said, is that changing the temperature by 10 C (approximately) doubles the rate. The question asked for the temperature at which the rate was doubled. So yes, the reaction rate is constant but ONLY for that particular temperature. At any other temperature the rate will be different. The "rule of thumb" is that we double the rate for 10 C change. So increasing T from 20 to 70 we increase rate by approximately 2^{5/sup> = 32 times faster.}

Okay, I think I get what you are saying. So, let's say that I keep the concentration of reactants constant, but I increase the temperature or decrease the temperature for a reaction. Since I played around with the temperature (i.e., varying it) I changed the reaction rate, that I calculated for the reaction for the same reaction before I varied the temperature, therefore I changed the constant k, since I used the same concentration to determine k. Is there a specific equation that shows how the relationship works, or did you learn this in course work or while doing research?

So increasing T from 20 to 70 we increase rate by approximately 25/sup> = 32 times faster.
This part here is why I am asking about an equation. 
Yes, it's the Arrhenius equation.
ln(k2/k1) = (Ea/R)(1/T1  1/T2). This give you a specific equation to determine what the new k will be at the new T. The 2^5 thing I quoted is a "rule of thumb" that is approximate. Try the equation giving values for k1 and T1 and Ea (R is 8.314 here) and use T2 that's 10+T1. Calculate k. It should be close to double k1. Or use ln (k2/k1) = ln 2 and solve for T2 for some given value of T1 and Ea. T2 should be close to 10 C. 
Got it. I had to reread the original problem to see what went on. I haven't had use for some of these calculations and years, so some concepts are fuzzier than others.
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

chem
The activation energy of a certain reaction is 30.3 kJ/mol. At 20 C, the rate constant is 0.0130 s^{1}. At what temperature would this reaction go twice as fast? 
~Chem
I was looing over this question and the answer I got was not correct, I noticed that somone already posted this question up before but maybe if I provide the answer I could get an understanding of the steps. @462degrees the reaction … 
chem
The rate data from a chemical reaction shows that doubling the concentration of A with the concentration of B remaining constant causes the rate to increase by a factor of four. What is the reaction order for [A]? 
Chem II
The equilibrium constant of a reaction is 12.6. If the rate constant of the reverse reaction is 5.1 x 10 2 the rate constant for the forward reaction is _____ 0.32 0.16 0.64 0.08 I don't even know where to start on this question. … 
CHEM
1.) At what temperature will the rate constant for the reaction H2 + I2 to 2HI have the value 5.2×10−3 M^{1}s^{1}? 
chemistry
Doing review for an exam and I can't find how to do this problem in my notes. 2 SO2 + 2 Cl2 > 2 SOCl2 + O2 from a previous problem I solved: rate=k[SO2]^2[Cl2] k = 467.666666... or in sig. figs 467 Energy reaction: T= 25 C … 
chemistry
Doing review for an exam and I can't find how to do this problem in my notes. 2 SO2 + 2 Cl2 > 2 SOCl2 + O2 from a previous problem I solved: rate=k[SO2]^2[Cl2] k = 467.666666... or in sig. figs 467 Energy reaction: T= 25 C … 
help help help chemistry
why will no one answer this question? For a one step reaction, the activation energy for the forward reaction is 40.0 kJ/mol and the enthalpy of reaction is 20.0 kJ /mol. Which statement below is true? 
chem
A certain firstorder reaction has a rate constant of 2.75 102 s−1 at 20.°C. What is the value of k at 50.°C if Ea = 75.5 kJ/mol? 
chemistry (Dr.Bob222)
In a reaction, if the concentration decreases faster, that means the reaction has a larger rate constant, and a faster reaction, and a shorter halflife. Is that a correct statement?