If an article has many examples of things that are given from people, are the examples from people still considered a source???

No ... only the article is the source. Whomever or whatever the author names will be referenced in the article.

ok thank you

You're welcome.

Yes, examples taken from people can still be considered a source, but it depends on the context and purpose of the article. In general, sources are used to provide credibility and evidence to support the information presented. Here's how you can determine if the examples from people in an article are considered a source:

1. Check the credibility of the individuals providing the examples: Consider the background, expertise, or qualifications of the people whose examples are being used. If they are experts, professionals, or eyewitnesses with relevant experience, their examples are likely credible sources.

2. Verify the reliability of the information: Assess the accuracy and reliability of the examples provided by cross-checking them with other sources or similar accounts. If multiple people share similar experiences or provide consistent information, it lends more credibility to the examples.

3. Evaluate the purpose and bias: Consider the intent of the article and the potential bias of the individuals providing examples. If the article aims to inform objectively, a diverse range of examples from different people strengthens its reliability. However, if the examples are heavily biased or from a narrow perspective, they may not be reliable sources.

4. Look for additional supporting evidence: Besides the examples, see if the article includes other forms of supporting evidence, such as data, statistics, or research studies. A combination of sources strengthens the overall credibility of the article.

Remember, it's important to critically evaluate the sources, including examples from people, to ensure the information is trustworthy and reliable.