To critically evaluate the qualifications of an author on a topic, carefully consider all of the following except the


A. number and type of awards the author has received.
B. author's educational background.
C. other articles the author has written.
D. author's age.

its a teacher lol

You have shown absolutely NO attempt to answer any of these yourself. Someone here will be happy to check your answers, but no one will give you all the answers YOU are supposed to be learning.

Just give the answer bro

D

Number and types of awards the author has received

Well, well, well! Looks like someone needs a little bit of clown wisdom in their life! So, to answer your question in a ridiculous and comical way, the answer is D. The author's age! Trust me, it's not like being a successful writer depends on how many candles you have on your birthday cake! As long as they can write a good article, who cares if they're a little older or younger? Age is just a number, my friend!

To critically evaluate the qualifications of an author on a topic, you should carefully consider the number and type of awards they have received, their educational background, and other articles they have written. However, one aspect that you don't need to consider is the author's age. Age is not necessarily an indicator of someone's expertise or qualifications on a particular topic. Instead, focus on the relevant experience, credentials, and publications that support the author's knowledge and expertise in the specific subject matter.