Math-truth table, please check my work!

posted by .

p -> ~q , p -> q
Are these Equivalent statements? This is my try. Please let me know if these truth tables are correct.
p -> ~q
p q p -> ~q p q p -> q
T T T T T T
T F T T F F
F T F F T F
F F T F F T


The statements are not equivalent.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. English-(PLEASE CHECK)

    George lies about the cause of Lennie's mental deficiency. Why does he change the story from the truth?
  2. Math- Truth Tables

    Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F …
  3. Math- Truth Tables

    Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F …
  4. philosophy (logic)

    I need to know if these two statements are independent: All winners are losers. All losers are winners. I am thinking that they are because I don't see that the truth or falsity of one tells anything about the truth or falsity of the …
  5. math

    Truth tables are related to Euler circles. Arguments in the form of Euler circles can be translated into statements using the basic connectives and the negation as follows: Let p be gthe object belongs to set Ah. Let q be gthe …
  6. truth tables

    (pVq)--> ~p Construct a truth table
  7. Truth tables

    How do I construct a truth table for (p v q)->~p
  8. PHI103

    I really need some help on these questions Please! I am having a very tough time. I have tried to answer to the best of my ability, but i am not understanding these. Can someone please help with this?
  9. phi103

    Mrs. Sue please help! I really need some help on these questions Please! I am having a very tough time. I have tried to answer to the best of my ability, but i am not understanding these. Can someone please help with this?
  10. Descrete maths

    Show that the following conditional statement is a tautology without using truth tables.[ p ^ ( p ! q )] ! q 8. Without the use of truth tables, determine whether ( : p ^ ( p ! q )) !: q is a tautology. show all your work

More Similar Questions