# Math-truth table, please check my work!

posted by .

p -> ~q , p -> q
Are these Equivalent statements? This is my try. Please let me know if these truth tables are correct.
p -> ~q
p q p -> ~q p q p -> q
T T T T T T
T F T T F F
F T F F T F
F F T F F T

The statements are not equivalent.

## Similar Questions

George lies about the cause of Lennie's mental deficiency. Why does he change the story from the truth?
2. ### Math- Truth Tables

Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F …
3. ### Math- Truth Tables

Construct a Truth Table for the given statement: 1. p implies ~(pVq) 2. ~(p AND q)Vp I thought this is how to do it, but my teacher marked it incorrect: 1. p q ~(pVq) p implies ~(pVq) T T F T implies T= T T F F T implies F= F F T F …
4. ### philosophy (logic)

I need to know if these two statements are independent: All winners are losers. All losers are winners. I am thinking that they are because I don't see that the truth or falsity of one tells anything about the truth or falsity of the …
5. ### math

Truth tables are related to Euler circles. Arguments in the form of Euler circles can be translated into statements using the basic connectives and the negation as follows: Let p be gthe object belongs to set Ah. Let q be gthe …
6. ### truth tables

(pVq)--> ~p Construct a truth table
7. ### Truth tables

How do I construct a truth table for (p v q)->~p
8. ### PHI103

I really need some help on these questions Please! I am having a very tough time. I have tried to answer to the best of my ability, but i am not understanding these. Can someone please help with this?