where can I get a comparism and contrast for the perils of indifference and the power of non-violence
a. Why don't you just read them, and compare and contrast?
b. Why are you looking for someone to do your thinking for you? Surely you are capable of this assignment.
c. I do recommend you pay attention to capitalization, and punctuation at the ends of sentences, as it does not speak well of your communication skills.
These may give you some ideas.
http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/wiesel.htm
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/02/28/how-indifference-can-kill-a-relationship/
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1131
http://www.mkgandhi.org/nonviolence/phil2.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/18/opinion/18iht-edbeyerle.1.7944048.html
To find a comparison and contrast between "The Perils of Indifference" and "The Power of Non-violence," you can follow these steps:
1. Understand the context: Familiarize yourself with the content and themes of each speech or essay. "The Perils of Indifference" was delivered by Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel in 1999, while "The Power of Non-violence" refers to the philosophy of non-violence advocated by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.
2. Read or watch the speeches/essays: Read or watch both "The Perils of Indifference" and speeches or essays related to "The Power of Non-violence". Take detailed notes on the main arguments, rhetorical devices used, and key ideas presented. These notes will help you compare and contrast the two.
3. Identify common themes: Look for common themes or ideas in both works. For example, both may touch upon concepts like justice, human rights, compassion, or the power of individuals to bring about change.
4. Analyze their approaches: Compare the speakers' approaches to addressing social issues. Consider their use of rhetorical devices, personal experiences, or historical references. Analyze how they build their arguments and make a case for their respective causes.
5. Contrast their perspectives: Identify the points where the two speeches differ in terms of their perspectives and approaches. Examine if their views on non-violence, indifference, or social change align or diverge.
6. Consider historical context: Reflect on the historical context in which each speech was given. Consider the relevant events, movements, and societal issues at the time. This will help you understand how the speeches respond to the specific challenges of their respective eras.
7. Synthesize your findings: Based on your analysis, create a comparative analysis that brings together the similarities and differences between "The Perils of Indifference" and "The Power of Non-violence." Highlight the key ideas, arguments, or strategies employed by each speaker and explain how they address similar or distinct aspects of social justice.
By following these steps, you'll be able to compare and contrast the speeches or philosophies of "The Perils of Indifference" and "The Power of Non-violence" effectively.