Science

posted by .

In the early 20th century, some scientists were reluctant to accept the conclusion that DNA could be the genetic material because it is so_________________.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. history - 20th century

    can i ahve some suggestions oif events in the 20th century?
  2. us history

    would appreciate links to research: culture change to the US in the 20th Century, and major reform periods in the US in the 20th Century. Thank you very much.
  3. Science

    How are the nucleus, genetic material, chromosomes, genes, DNA, and base pairs interrelated?
  4. History

    Why were the imperialists interested in Jamaica in the 19th or early 20th centuries?
  5. English

    Can you check this question and answer?(I need to shorten the answer: points 2-3) 1) Describe the kind of technique adopted by writers (at the beginning of the 20th century OR by early 20th century writers) to represent the unspoken
  6. Biology

    Using RNA a s a template for prot e in synthesis instead of t r ans l a t ing prot e ins directly from the DNA is advantageous for the cell because A) RNA is much more stable than DNA. B) RNA acts as an expendable copy of the genetic …
  7. Science

    Why is it important for scientists to be open-minded but skeptical?
  8. Science

    If one rabbit had brown fur and another has black fur, what conclusion can you draw about the rabbits' genetic codes?
  9. Genetics, HELP!!!

    Planet X, a recently discovered planet, contains life forms that have double-stranded DNA as the genetic material. The DNA on Planet X is transcribed into RNA which is translated into protein. Planet X DNA contains only two bases: …
  10. science

    why did scientists think that proteins were the genetic material and not nucleic acids?

More Similar Questions