Suppose the president is attempting to decide whether the federal gov should spend more research to find a cure for heart disease.
How should policy makers determine the amount of money that should be allocated for research curing heart disease? they should base their decision on.
a) the value of the total benefit of research on curing other diseases
b) whether the last dollar devoted to research on heart disease results in more benefit than the last dollar spent on research for curing other diseases.
d) the value of the total benefit of the research on heart disease
e)the number of people who die from heart disease compared to the number of people who die from other diseases
i'd say A
When policy makers are determining the amount of money that should be allocated for research on curing heart disease, they should consider multiple factors to make an informed decision. These factors can include:
a) The value of the total benefit of research on curing other diseases: This involves considering the potential impact and benefits of research conducted on other diseases. By evaluating the total value and potential outcomes of research in various areas, policy makers can compare the benefits of allocating resources for heart disease research versus research on other diseases.
b) Whether the last dollar devoted to research on heart disease results in more benefit than the last dollar spent on research for curing other diseases: This approach involves assessing the marginal utility or effectiveness of the resources allocated for heart disease research versus resources allocated for other diseases. By determining which research area provides higher returns in terms of health outcomes and benefits, policy makers can make a reasoned choice.
d) The value of the total benefit of research on heart disease: Policy makers can analyze the overall impact and benefits of research dedicated to curing heart disease. This approach involves evaluating the potential advancements, treatments, and overall improvement in public health that can be derived from investing in heart disease research.
e) The number of people who die from heart disease compared to the number of people who die from other diseases: Policy makers can prioritize resources based on the magnitude and impact of heart disease as compared to other diseases. By considering the comparative mortality rates and public health burden, they can determine the relative importance of allocating funds for heart disease research.
It's essential for policy makers to consider a combination of these factors and potentially other relevant considerations to make an informed decision on the amount of money that should be allocated for research on curing heart disease.