you have examined four approaches to explaining criminal behavior: classical, positivist, structural, and ethical. Select and research one of those approaches. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of your selected approach. Explain whether you think the approach adequately explains "why people do bad things," that is, why they commit crimes.
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
Im confused on how to do it
1. Choose one of the four approaches to explaining criminal behavior: classical, positivist, structural, and ethical.
2. Research one of these approaches.
3. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of your selected approach.
4. Explain whether you think the approach adequately explains "why people do bad things," that is, why they commit crimes.
Don't no
To research and understand one of the approaches to explaining criminal behavior, let's delve into the positivist approach. Positivism focuses on understanding criminal behavior using scientific methods and empirical evidence. It assumes that criminal behavior is determined by individual characteristics, psychological factors, and societal influences rather than rational choice.
Strengths of the positivist approach:
1. Empirical Basis: Positivism relies on scientific research and objective data analysis, providing a more evidence-based understanding of criminal behavior.
2. Biological Factors: This approach acknowledges the role of biological factors such as genetics, brain chemistry, and hormonal imbalances, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior.
3. Psychological Factors: Positivists recognize the significance of psychological traits, mental disorders, or personality disturbances impacting criminal conduct.
Weaknesses of the positivist approach:
1. Reductionism: Some critics argue that the positivist approach reduces the understanding of criminal behavior to individual determinants and disregards social, cultural, or economic factors that may also influence criminality.
2. Overemphasis on Biology: Critics assert that putting too much emphasis on biological factors may oversimplify the complex nature of criminal behavior and overlook environmental triggers and situational contexts.
3. Labeling Effect: The positivist approach's reliance on categorizing individuals based on psychological or biological traits may lead to stigmatization and the potential for self-fulfilling prophecies.
Regarding the adequacy of explaining "why people do bad things," the positivist approach contributes valuable insights but is not without limitations. While it offers scientific reasoning and considers individual factors, it may not sufficiently address the broader social, economic, and cultural aspects that foster criminal behavior.
To gain a comprehensive understanding beyond the positivist approach, it is essential to consider other theories such as classical, ethical, and structural explanations of criminal behavior. Being aware of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach helps build a more comprehensive perspective on why individuals engage in criminal activities.