Causation in toxic tort cases is discussed in terms of:
a) General and specific causation.
b) Sharing expenses and risk.
c) Strict liability and breach of warranty.
d) a and c.
e) None of the above.
a? im torn between two answers
In toxic tort cases, causation is discussed in terms of general and specific causation. To determine causation, two key elements are considered:
1. General Causation: This refers to the establishment of a causal connection between a particular toxic substance and a given health condition or disease. It involves examining scientific evidence, such as studies and research, to establish whether the toxic substance in question is capable of causing the alleged harm.
2. Specific Causation: This refers to the demonstration that the exposure to the specific toxic substance is the actual cause of the plaintiff's injuries or health condition. It involves examining individual factors, such as the plaintiff's medical history, timing of exposure, and any other relevant evidence, to establish a direct link between the exposure and the harm suffered.
Given these explanations, the correct answer to your question would be (d) "a and c," as general and specific causation are the terms used when discussing causation in toxic tort cases, whereas sharing expenses and risk (b) and strict liability and breach of warranty (c) are not directly related to the concept of causation.