37. On the lines below, explain why the graph you choose is misleading?

Answer - The reason why graph A was misleading is because on the left side (where the numbers are) it started from 0 to 50, then 50 to 100, AND 100 to 300! From 100 to 300 is too much, plus when plotting dots between your gonna get confused. I consider put 10 by 10 or 20 by 20.
Questions:
1. Is it good????
2. Is there any grammar or errors mistakes???
3. Is it correct????

Thank You!

ok

thank you

btw - read my other post ;)

1. It is difficult to determine if the explanation is good without seeing the graph in question. However, the explanation provided seems to suggest that the chosen graph (graph A) is misleading due to its uneven intervals on the left side. The abrupt change from 100 to 300 can cause confusion when interpreting the data. The suggestion to use more consistent intervals, such as increments of 10 or 20, would make it easier to read and understand the graph.

2. In terms of grammar and errors, there is a mix of sentence fragments and run-on sentences in the explanation. To improve clarity, it is advisable to structure the response into complete sentences. Additionally, there are a few minor grammatical mistakes, such as missing punctuation marks and inconsistent capitalization. Proofreading and editing the explanation would help to improve its overall quality.

3. Without seeing the graph in question, it is difficult to determine if the explanation is correct. However, the explanation does highlight a potential issue with the graph's intervals and suggests a solution for improvement. To make a definitive judgment on the correctness of the explanation, it would be necessary to assess the graph itself and compare it to the description provided.

It looks good to me!

Correction:

"gonna" is not a word.