why was general grant better able than general lee to withstand tremendous losses?

I'll be glad to comment on your answer.

i was thinking that grant was more able than lee because he didn't take as many risks. lee tried to fight off the union by going to their front line and well they failed miserably because almost every one died but from the start grant was thinking on how to end the war. he was going (and did) blockaid the southerners. he cut them off from the rest of the world they had to scour previous battles for unused bullets and guns and their food supply was low and in 1865 there was even a famine the wealthy even went to bed hungry. but i don't know if all this answers the question...

Wasn't the Union army much larger than the Confederate army?

what was grantbetter able than lee to witch lands t

General Grant was better able than General Lee to withstand tremendous losses for several reasons:

1. Material resources: Grant had access to superior resources in terms of manpower and supplies. The Union, under Grant's command, had a larger population base and a more extensive industrial capacity compared to the Confederacy. This enabled Grant to replenish his losses more quickly and sustain his army's strength.

2. Strategic goals: Grant understood that the Union had a larger pool of resources and could afford to sustain higher losses than the Confederacy. He adopted a strategy of attrition, seeking to wear down the Confederate forces through relentless engagements and constant pressure. Lee, on the other hand, had to be more cautious with his limited resources and couldn't afford to sustain heavy losses.

3. Union's numerical advantage: Grant had the advantage of superior numbers. He could afford to engage in battles that involved higher casualties because he had more soldiers available. This allowed Grant to absorb losses and still maintain a significant fighting force.

4. Logistics: Grant effectively utilized the Union's logistical advantages. He ensured a steady supply of provisions, ammunition, and reinforcements to his army. This logistical advantage helped sustain his troops and counterbalanced the losses they incurred in battle.

5. Political support: Grant enjoyed strong political support from the Union government and President Lincoln. This support gave him the freedom to pursue his aggressive tactics and absorb losses without facing criticism or interference.

In summary, Grant's access to superior resources, willingness to sustain high casualties, numerical advantage, effective logistics, and political support all contributed to his ability to withstand tremendous losses better than General Lee.