PHi103

posted by .

Karl Popper advocates, as a more efficient way to examine a scientific hypothesis, which of the following

I believe it could be A Gather as much data as possible supporting the hypothesis

  • PHi103 -

    What are your choices?

  • PHi103 -

    Karl Popper advocates, as a more efficient way to examine a scientific hypothesis, which of the following?

    a)Gather as much data as possible supporting the hypothesis
    b)Fake the data
    c)Try to show the hypothesis is false
    d)Meditate on what the hypothesis really means

    I believe the answer was A but not so sure now, maybe

  • PHi103 -

    You are absolutely right.

  • PHi103 -

    the answer is C

  • PHi103 -

    The answer to the question about Karl Popper advocates, as a more efficient way to examine a scientific hypothesis which of the following. Wrong answer Ashley. You are really close but if you look at the question on how it's asked you will find the answer better. A MORE EFFICIENT WAY TO EXAMINE A SCIENTIFIC HYPOTHESIS THAN THE WAY IT WAS BEING DONE IS??? I took this quiz today and got 100%. Just want to help. Ms. D is right

  • PHi103 -

    The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show

  • PHi103 -

    The answer is C. Try to show the hypothesis is false.

Respond to this Question

First Name
School Subject
Your Answer

Similar Questions

  1. economics

    How do an economist as a scientist and an economist as a policy advisor help to create understanding of economics?
  2. phi 103

    1. Logic can help analyze ethical problems. (Points : 1) True False 2. Putting an argument into premise-conclusion form can make it easier to (Points : 1) ignore the argument. think the argument is pretty. evaluate the argument. avoid …
  3. PHI 103

    Kari Popper advocates, as a more efficient way to examine a scientific hypothesis, which of the following?
  4. phi

    Karl Popper advocates, as a more efficient way to examine a scientific hypothesis, which of the following?
  5. phi 103

    Provide a scientific hypothesis and explain how one might go about testing it, either by confirming the hypothesis or using karl poppers strategy of discofirmation. Also, which are the two strategies are better
  6. Ashford

    Provide a scientific hypothesis and explain how one might go about testing it, either by confirming the hypothesis or using Karl Popper's strategy of disconfirmation. Discuss which of these two strategies is better and why
  7. Earth Science

    A scientific hypothesis can become a theory if?
  8. Biology

    1. True or false: even when your research does not support your hypothesis, the hypothesis has value. True False 2. Which one of these could define a "hypothesis?
  9. Microbes and Society

    Which of the following is the correct sequence of steps in the scientific method?
  10. microbes and society

    Which of the following is the correct sequence of steps in the scientific method?

More Similar Questions