Science Chemistry
There is a large [Cr2O7]-2 absorbance observed at 360 nm. Why can this wavelength not be used instead of the smaller absorbance at 440 nm?
Unfortunately I don't have all of the information you have before me but I suspect it has to do with some other ion absorbing at 350 nm. What is that ion? Could it be HCrO4^-?
You can ask a new question or answer this question .
Similar Questions
Top answer:
It isn't necessary at all but you want to do that for maximum sensitivity. Think, however, about the
Read more.
Top answer:
Absorbance std = k*concn std 2.55 = k*8 Solve for k. Absorbance sample = k*concn sample 2.31 = k
Read more.
Top answer:
The galaxy that is shifted most to the red (#3) is the one that is moving fastest away from Earth.
Read more.
Top answer:
Did you leave off the electrons? What you have check is the reduction reaction but that isn't right
Read more.
Top answer:
I posted a qestion to you yesterday asking what 1.5 M e meant. No answer from you. I see you're
Read more.
Redox reactions (Cr2O7)2- + 2Al + 14H+ <—> 2Cr3+ + 2Al3++ 7H2O 1) how many ml of solution 1.50 M e (Cr2O7)2- are needed to act
Top answer:
I don't know what 1.5 M e (Cr2O7)2- means.
Read more.
Top answer:
mols Cl^- = M x L = ? Using the coefficients in the balanced equation, convert mols Cl^- to mols
Read more.
Top answer:
and the 0.077 was set to that because that was the lowest number I could get on spectrometer...
Read more.
Top answer:
Same procedure but on the second run you plug in k from the first run, C from the second run, and
Read more.