Which of the following was NOT a reason why a stronger central government was needed?


To solve the economic problems of the United States

=To limit individual liberties

To deal with military matters both internal and external

To make the States work together as a single unified nation

I really need help, thanks.

I agree.

To determine which of the given options was NOT a reason why a stronger central government was needed, we will go through each option and eliminate the ones that were indeed reasons for strengthening the central government.

1. To solve the economic problems of the United States: This was indeed a reason for a stronger central government. The Articles of Confederation, the initial governing document of the United States, had limited powers to address economic issues, leading to financial instability and difficulties in regulating commerce.

2. To limit individual liberties: This option is a negative statement, suggesting that limiting individual liberties was not a reason for a stronger central government. This concept runs counter to the traditional purpose of a central government, as it is generally tasked with protecting and preserving individual liberties rather than limiting them. Therefore, this option is the correct answer to your question.

3. To deal with military matters both internal and external: This was a crucial reason for a stronger central government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the central government lacked the power to raise and maintain a standing army, making it challenging to address threats to national security.

4. To make the States work together as a single unified nation: This was also a reason for a stronger central government. The Articles of Confederation created a loose alliance of states, leading to difficulties in coordinating and enforcing national policies and undermining the unity of the nation.

In conclusion, the option that was NOT a reason why a stronger central government was needed is: To limit individual liberties.