I left out the following statements. Could you please check them? Thak you..

1) A third-person narrator can tell the story as an omniscient narrator, who knows everything about the events and the characters’ thoughts using an unlimited point of view or the point of view of a character.
6) The omniscient third-person narrator can be intrusive (obtrusive) when he addresses the reader directly by making personal remarks on the society of the time, on some of the characters. The narrator is unobtrusive when he shows what happens but does not interfere with the story.
7) On the other hand, a non-omniscient narrator tells the story from the outside and from a neutral point of view. The reader is given more freedom but less knowledge, and is asked to intepret the significance of the characters' words and acts.

1) A third-person narrator can tell the story as an omniscient narrator, who knows everything about the events and the characters’ thoughts and uses an unlimited point of view or the point of view of a character.

6) The omniscient third-person narrator can be intrusive when he addresses the reader directly by making personal remarks about the society of the time or about some of the characters. The narrator is unobtrusive when he shows what happens, but does not interfere with the story.

7) On the other hand, a non-omniscient narrator tells the story from the outside, from a neutral point of view. The reader is given more freedom, but less knowledge, and is asked to intepret the significance of the characters' words and actions.

1) The statement is correct. A third-person narrator can choose to tell the story as an omniscient narrator, meaning they have knowledge about everything that happens in the story, including the thoughts and feelings of the characters. They can also choose to have a limited point of view and only provide insights from the perspective of a particular character.

6) The statement is correct. An omniscient third-person narrator can be intrusive or obtrusive when they address the reader directly and make personal remarks about the society or characters in the story. This can break the illusion of the story and remind the reader that they are being told a fictional tale. On the other hand, the narrator can be unobtrusive and simply present the events of the story without interfering or making personal remarks.

7) The statement is correct. A non-omniscient narrator tells the story from an external perspective and remains neutral. They do not have access to the thoughts and feelings of the characters, giving the reader more freedom to interpret the significance of the characters' words and actions. However, this also means that the reader has less knowledge about the characters and their motivations compared to an omniscient narrator.