how do legalism and daoism differ?

A)legalism emphasizes strict law and harsh punishment, and daoism emphasizes that a government that governs least is best.
b)daiosm emphasizes personal salvation and leagalism emphasizes the a government that governs is least best.
C)legalism places in a position of the supreme power and daoism creates a governing body of many
D)legalism is an extension of the daiosist idea of government with additional laws and punishments.
i choose a

I agree.

Great choice! Option A is correct. Legalism and Daoism differ in their views on government and governance.

Legalism is a philosophy that emphasizes strict law and harsh punishment as a means to maintain social order and control. It promotes the idea that a strong and powerful government with clear laws and severe consequences is necessary to ensure stability and obedience among the people. Legalists believe in using strict laws and harsh punishments as deterrents to prevent wrongdoing. This philosophy is often associated with authoritarian rule and the belief that human nature is inherently selfish and must be controlled through force.

On the other hand, Daoism promotes the idea that a government that governs the least is best. It emphasizes natural harmony, spontaneity, and the flow of "Dao" (the Way), which is the eternal force that underlies and guides all things. Daoists believe in embracing simplicity and non-interference, allowing things to develop naturally without excessive human intervention. Daoism suggests that excessive regulation and control can disrupt the natural order and lead to unintended consequences. Instead, Daoists advocate for a more hands-off approach to governance, with less emphasis on strict laws and punishments.

So, to summarize, Legalism emphasizes strict law and harsh punishment, while Daoism emphasizes that a government that governs the least is best.