Geometry
posted by Lauren .
Which is logically equivalent to ~p > q?
a.) ~q > p
b.) ~q > ~p
c.) q > p
d.) q > ~p

I am not certain of your usage of >, but I have a technique you can use that will work always.
Construct a truth table, such as this:
http://www.gateways2learning.com/SetTheory/EquivalentStatements.pdf 
It is just like your previous post. The contrapositive of
~p > q
reverses the direction of implication, and the logical values:
~(q) > ~(~p)
~q > p
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

math
Which statement is logically equivalent to ~a ¨ b? 
discrete mathematics with applications
Determine which of the following pairs of statements forms are logically equivalent. Justify your answer using truth tables and include a few words of explanation. Read "t" to be a tautology and "c" to be a contradiction: 26. (p^q)v(p^r)and(pvq)^r … 
Discrete math
Question: Use logical equivalnces to show that the propositions !p > (q>r) and q > (p v r) are logically equivalent. I AM SO DAMN CONFUSED! I tried to solve !p > (q > r) first and I only got to !p > (!q v r) … 
math
Question: Use logical equivalnces to show that the propositions !p > (q>r) and q > (p v r) are logically equivalent. I AM SO DAMN CONFUSED! I tried to solve !p > (q > r) first and I only got to !p > (!q v r) … 
Geometry
In logic, which of the following is said to be logically equivalent to the original statement? 
Geometry
A conditional statement is always logically equivalent to its a.) contrapositive b.) converse c.) conjunction d.) inverse 
Geometry
Look at the statement below. “All dogs are mammals.” Which of these is a logically equivalent statement? 
Geometry
If Gina cleans her room, then she will go to the mall. Which of these is logically equivalent to the given statement? 
math
If Tom buys a red skateboard, then Anne buys pink inline skates." Which statement below is logically equivalent? 
Logic / Discrete Mathematics
Show that "¬p Λ q is logically equivalent to p → ¬q" . I'm not sure if the conditional identity is correct, but what I did was I negated the whole second condition and it immediately became equal to the first?