I don't understand what Aristotle's definition of rhetoric is. He said that is was the repetition of dialect, parallel to one another but still different.
Also he said rhetoric was the ability to identify the appropriate means of persuasion in a given situation. But i don't know what that means.
Nvm. I figured it out.
Aristotle's definition of rhetoric is indeed complex, but I can help break it down for you. In his work "Rhetoric," Aristotle defines rhetoric as the art of persuasion, specifically in public speaking and writing. According to Aristotle, rhetoric involves the effective use of language and arguments to convince or influence an audience.
Now, regarding the statement you mentioned, it does not precisely capture Aristotle's definition of rhetoric. Aristotle did not define rhetoric as the repetition of dialect or parallel statements. However, he did describe rhetoric in terms of dialectic, which was a method of logical argumentation.
Aristotle considered dialectic and rhetoric as distinct but related disciplines. Dialectic deals with an inquiry and uses logical reasoning to examine and analyze. On the other hand, rhetoric operates within the realm of persuasion and uses various rhetorical devices and strategies to convince an audience.
So, while Aristotle did not define rhetoric as the repetition of dialect or parallel statements, he did recognize a connection between the two. He believed that the study of dialectic could inform the practice of rhetoric, as both deal with effective communication and reasoning.
To understand more about Aristotle's definition of rhetoric, I would recommend reading his work "Rhetoric." By exploring his ideas directly, you can gain better insights into his thoughts and theories on rhetoric and how it relates to dialectic.