The task is to redesign Milgram's experiment so no one is hurt, physically or emotionally. However, from my understanding, the experiment is designed to test how far subjects will obey an authority figure even if it means inflicting pain on another. To inform the subject, in my opinion, severely hinders the purpose of the experiment. Is there a way to test obedience AND inform the subject?
Redesigning Milgram's experiment to ensure no harm, both physical and emotional, to subjects is indeed a valid and important concern. While the original experiment involved deceiving participants about the nature of the experiment, it is possible to modify the design to test obedience while still informing the subjects.
Here's a proposed way to test obedience while also informing the subjects:
1. Prior informed consent: Before participating in the experiment, potential subjects should receive detailed information about the nature, purpose, and potential risks involved. They should have the opportunity to ask questions and fully understand what they are consenting to.
2. Clear explanation and expectations: Subjects should be provided with a clear and accurate explanation of the experiment's objectives, including the investigation into obedience and authority. It's important to emphasize that no harm will come to anyone involved.
3. Simulated scenario: Instead of using actual shocks or pain inducements, a simulated scenario can be created. For example, participants can be informed that the experiment will involve a virtual environment or role-play simulation where they believe they are inflicting pain, but in reality, no one is harmed.
4. Realistic authority figure: A researcher or authority figure can still be present to exert influence on participants, simulating the conditions of obedience. However, their role should be clearly stated as being part of the experiment, and their influence should not extend beyond the boundaries of the simulation.
5. Debriefing and emotional support: After the experiment, participants should be thoroughly debriefed. They should have the opportunity to discuss their feelings, reactions, and any potential emotional impact from the experiment. Researchers should be prepared to provide emotional support or referrals to appropriate resources, if necessary.
By incorporating these modifications, it is possible to design an experiment that tests obedience while also ensuring informed consent and participant well-being. This approach respects ethical considerations and can still yield valuable insights into the psychology of obedience.